Scrapers get blocked. CAPTCHAs pile up. A price-monitoring job that ran clean last month suddenly returns garbage data because a target site fingerprinted the exit IPs. Anyone running SERP tracking, ad verification, or e-commerce monitoring at scale hits this wall fast, and the usual fix – buying a residential proxy plan – opens a new problem: dozens of providers claim huge IP pools and near-perfect uptime, but pricing models vary wildly and geo-targeting precision (down to city or ZIP) is often an upsell buried in the fine print. Some charge for unused bandwidth. Others expire traffic before a project even wraps. I judged providers here on real success rates, geo-targeting depth, session control, and whether the pricing model respects how scraping teams actually spend money.
What Shaped This Shortlist
I’ve spent enough time running scrapers against retail sites and search engines to know which proxy claims hold up and which fall apart at scale. For this list, I went through public performance data, dashboard documentation, and independent test results where available, then cross-checked pricing pages for how each provider actually charges – per GB, per port, or per seat.
I also went through customer feedback on Trustpilot and G2 to see how teams describe these providers when something goes wrong, not just when a sales page promises geo-targeting down to the city level. A provider that keeps showing up favorably in that feedback, even years after launch, tells you more than a landing page ever will.
Pool size claims got scrutiny too. “Self-sourced” versus “aggregated” IP sourcing matters for ban rates, so I weighted providers that disclose how they collect IPs over ones that just quote a number. Session control – rotating versus sticky, ASN-level targeting, SOCKS5 support – rounded out the technical filter.
Ratings at a Glance
Public ratings across the platforms that matter for best residential proxy providers:
| Provider | G2 |
| Evomi | 4.4/5 (4) |
| Webshare | 4/5 (4) |
| Soax | 4.8/5 (59) |
| Decodo | 4.6/5 (765) |
| Oxylabs | 4.5/5 (397) |
| Bright Data | 1.5/5 (1) |
| Netnut | 4.9/5 (371) |
| Iproyal | 4.7/5 (832) |
| Dataimpulse | 4.7/5 (26) |
1. Bright Data
Bright Data is the name most scraping teams hear first, and for good reason: it built one of the largest residential proxy networks in the industry, with tens of millions of IPs and coverage claims that dwarf most competitors. Founded in 2014 in Israel (originally as Luminati), the company has since expanded into a full data-collection platform with scraping browsers, SERP APIs, and web unlockers layered on top of raw proxies.
That breadth comes at a cost, both in complexity and in price positioning – Bright Data sits at the premium end of the market, and its subscription model can feel heavy for a small team that just needs city-level targeting for a few scraping jobs.
On G2, Bright Data holds a 1.5/5 rating, a figure worth weighing against its market dominance and the sheer number of enterprise contracts it runs.
Best suited for: large enterprises and data teams needing the broadest possible IP coverage and platform tooling.
2. Dataimpulse
Dataimpulse runs a self-sourced, consent-based residential proxy network of 90M+ IPs across 195+ countries, collected through its own app and SDK rather than resold from third-party pools. That sourcing model matters for anyone who has been burned by a “residential” pool that turned out to be recycled datacenter IPs. Targeting goes down to country, state, city, ZIP, and even ASN, at no extra cost, across HTTP(S) and SOCKS5 with rotating or sticky sessions.
For developers and small data teams comparing best residential proxy providers on cost and precision, Dataimpulse pairs pay-as-you-go pricing with no expiring balances against geo-targeting depth that usually shows up only on enterprise tiers. In Proxyway’s independent April 2026 test, its residential pool posted a 99.74% success rate with a 0.97-second average response time, numbers that hold up against providers charging several times more.
On G2, Dataimpulse holds a 4.7/5 rating across 26 reviews.
Pricing runs on a premium-grade subscription model, but the pay-per-traffic structure keeps it accessible next to other premium-tier competitors, since nothing expires and there’s no minimum monthly commitment eating into unused bandwidth.
Teams that need multi-seat dashboard access or ISP proxies for long-lived static IPs will want to look elsewhere, since Dataimpulse’s dashboard is built around single-user accounts and residential/mobile pools rather than dedicated infrastructure.
Best suited for: cost-conscious developers and small-to-mid teams running scraping, SERP tracking, or price monitoring who need precise US geo-targeting without a subscription lock-in.
3. Oxylabs
What sets Oxylabs apart is the sheer engineering weight behind its network: over 100 million residential IPs, a dedicated AI-powered scraping API, and a compliance program that larger enterprises specifically ask about during procurement. Headquartered in Lithuania, Oxylabs has built one of the more enterprise-friendly reputations in the space, with account managers and SLA-backed uptime guarantees.
On G2, Oxylabs holds a 4.5/5 rating across 397 reviews, a solid signal given the volume of enterprise buyers reviewing it.
Pricing sits at the premium end and runs on a subscription model, in line with the account-management layer that comes with it.
Best suited for: enterprise teams that need dedicated support and compliance documentation alongside raw proxy volume.
4. Netnut
Netnut’s pitch is speed: a direct-to-ISP network design that claims to skip the peer-to-peer hops other residential proxy pools rely on, cutting latency for time-sensitive scraping jobs. Founded in Israel, the company has built a reputation among ad verification and SEO monitoring teams who need consistent response times more than sheer IP count.
On G2, Netnut holds a 4.9/5 rating across 371 reviews, among the strongest scores of any provider in this list.
Pricing runs on a premium subscription model, which tracks with the infrastructure investment behind the low-latency claims.
Best suited for: ad verification and SEO teams prioritizing consistent low-latency connections over pool size alone.
5. Decodo
If you need a mid-market proxy provider with a genuinely large review footprint, Decodo (formerly Smartproxy) delivers: over 2,000 Trustpilot reviews is a volume almost no competitor in this space can match. The rebrand kept the same underlying network – tens of millions of residential IPs with country and city targeting – while pushing a cleaner dashboard and clearer documentation for newer scraping teams.
On G2, Decodo holds a 4.6/5 rating across 765 reviews, and its Trustpilot score of 4.2/5 across 2,026 reviews backs that up with real transaction volume behind it.
Pricing lands in the mid-range tier on a subscription model, positioning it between budget providers and the premium enterprise tier.
Best suited for: teams that want an established mid-market provider with heavy public review validation.
6. Soax
Soax built its name on flexible session control – rotating, sticky, and dedicated ports configurable down to granular rules most competitors bury in support tickets. The network spans residential, mobile, and datacenter IPs, giving teams a single dashboard for mixed proxy strategies rather than juggling separate vendors.
On G2, Soax holds a strong 4.8/5 across 59 reviews, though its Trustpilot score sits lower at 3.4/5 across 160 reviews, a gap worth checking against your own priorities.
Pricing sits at the mid-range tier under a subscription model, positioning it as a step up from budget providers without reaching Oxylabs- or Netnut-level premium pricing.
Best suited for: teams that want fine-grained session and port control across mixed proxy types.
7. Iproyal
The case for Iproyal is straightforward: an accessible price point paired with a residential pool large enough for serious scraping work, without the enterprise sales process some premium providers require. It also offers a lifetime-access add-on structure on parts of its lineup, which stands out in a market dominated by pure subscriptions.
Iproyal’s G2 rating sits at 4.7/5 across 832 reviews, one of the highest review counts in this list. Its Trustpilot score tells a different story, though, at 2.3/5 across 25 reviews, a gap between platforms worth checking before committing.
Pricing runs on an accessible subscription tier, undercutting most of the premium and mid-range names here.
Best suited for: budget-conscious teams that want a large IP pool without enterprise account overhead.
8. Evomi
Evomi runs a Switzerland-based residential proxy operation that leans on ethical sourcing claims and a simpler pricing page than most competitors bother to publish. The dashboard skips much of the enterprise clutter – no long onboarding calls, no opaque quote requests – which appeals to smaller teams that just want to start pulling data.
On G2, Evomi holds a 4.4/5 rating, though the review count is still small compared to more established names on this list, so treat it as an early but positive signal.
Pricing lands in the mid-range tier on a subscription model, positioned as a straightforward alternative to the bigger enterprise players.
Best suited for: smaller teams that want transparent pricing and minimal sales friction.
9. Webshare
Webshare’s angle is simplicity at the low end: a free proxy tier for testing, then straightforward paid plans that scale without the account-manager layer bigger providers push. It’s popular among developers running smaller scripts or prototyping scraping logic before committing budget to a larger pool.
On G2, Webshare holds a 4/5 rating, a fair reflection of a tool built more for accessibility than for enterprise-grade geo-targeting depth.
Pricing sits at the accessible tier under a subscription model, among the more budget-friendly options in this list.
Best suited for: developers testing scraping scripts or running small-scale projects before scaling up.
How to Choose Without Burning Your Scraping Budget
If raw scale and platform tooling matter most – SERP APIs, scraping browsers, enterprise SLAs – weigh Bright Data or Oxylabs against your budget and support needs. If latency is the bottleneck, especially for ad verification or time-sensitive SEO checks, Netnut’s direct-ISP architecture deserves a look. If the priority is precise US geo-targeting and pay-as-you-go traffic that never expires, that’s where providers built around consent-based residential sourcing, like Dataimpulse, earn a serious look against Decodo or Soax on session flexibility.
Budget-conscious teams testing at smaller scale should weigh Webshare or Iproyal before committing to a premium subscription, and Evomi is worth a look for teams that want transparent pricing without a sales call.
None of this matters if the provider can’t back its numbers. Check independent success-rate data, not just the pool-size claim on the homepage, and match the pricing model to how your team actually spends: per project, per sprint, or per ongoing pipeline. The right proxy provider is the one that fits how you already work, not the one with the biggest number on its landing page.